With the advancement in technology, the number of computers being used in the field of education has increased. Some people believe that there will be no role of teachers in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the teacher role in regards to increasing the number of computers has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "what are the Pros and Cons of technology advancement and increasing the number of computers?". Whereas it is a widely held view that there will be no role of teacher in the classroom, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, new teaching methods are bound up inextricably with examination booklet, which indicates they lead to both oral exam and written assignment. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between human assessment and computer assessment as well as an exponential increase in inaccuracy. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of overall grade is correlated positively with not only inherited ability but also classroom activities.
Within the realm of modern world, without the slightest doubt, technological achievement attribute to internet, in that it would come down to computer, smart phone, and tablet. A salient example of such attribution is electronic books, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take teacher's role decreasing for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint environmental degradation problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to team tasks, course syllabus, and even book plans. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of internet and broadband connection for providing vast information.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the role of teacher will not decrease by increasing of computer users. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 28, Rule ID: IN_REGARD_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'regarding' or 'with regard to'.
Suggestion: regarding; with regard to
Recently, the teacher role in regards to increasing the number of computers has ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cts of that throughout this essay. From the educational standpoint, new tea...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ity but also classroom activities. Within the realm of modern world, withou...
^^^^^^^
Line 21, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...on for providing vast information. To conclude, as for myself, as the sayin...
^^^^^^^
Line 25, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1777.0 1207.87684729 147% => OK
No of words: 311.0 242.827586207 128% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71382636656 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19603796244 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 139.433497537 149% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.668810289389 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 379.143842365 142% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0557704947 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.692307692 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9230769231 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198404246525 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0543309237008 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669803090341 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117264370334 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.091129872367 0.0609392437508 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 12.6369458128 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.62 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 55.0591133005 209% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.