artificially intelligent robots are increasingly taking human jobs. some people believe that eventually that all work will be done by robots while others believe that there will be a limit to tasks that robots can perform.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you choose the position.
Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on the artificially intelligent robots which are in increasingly replacing humans in their jobs can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My opinion is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I agree that some limitations are existed for robots in some certain jobs to carry over.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, robots can not do some specific human jobs in the same professionalism, and there are some considered factors in each job to ensure its outcome and avoid any unfavorable outcomes. It is important to note that doctors, at the emergency care unit, play a vital role in patient`s health and life when they need to act proactively at any unfavorable health occurrence to save the patient`s life. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that Artificial intelligence can not replace some important jobs.
In addition, Artificially intelligent robots are associated with significant limitations. First and foremost, Robots are still dependent machines on several factors, and they are only programmed to certain actions to deal with. Although robots are one of the cutting-edge technologies, they are not ready to deal with unusual incidents which human can easily tackle with some deep thinking based on their previous experience in similar situations.
To conclude, I see that robots are now play pivotal roles in different jobs in our life; however, my opinion is that they cannot perform in the way to be acceptable from different aspects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 109, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...al agreement, a constructive dialogue on the artificially intelligent robots whic...
^^
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s. It is important to note that doctors, at the emergency care unit, play a vital...
^^
Line 7, column 40, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'played'.
Suggestion: played
... To conclude, I see that robots are now play pivotal roles in different jobs in ou...
^^^^
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...conclude, I see that robots are now play pivotal roles in different jobs in our ...
^^
Line 7, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that robots are now play pivotal roles in different jobs in our life; however, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, still, therefore, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 259.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37837837838 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22200251694 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.1544678307 50.4703680194 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.3 104.977214359 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259975109847 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101665867426 0.0925447433944 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639883089106 0.071462118173 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150638627864 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0548622614529 0.0609392437508 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.