Companies involve employees in decision making policy. Is this a good approach? Do you agree or disagree?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on involving the employees of the companies in decision making policy can lead to thought-provoking discussions. My opinion is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, I agree to some extent based on the circumstances.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, some firms put their regulations with the workers assistance, and it is getting agreed before putting it on effect. It is important to note that when the rules are discussed in between all workers and management, it will be acceptable while applying from all disciplines. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that discussing such important policy before publishing it is beneficial for all.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that not all polices can be discussed with the employees, and some confidential information shall be treated wisely. First and foremost, if there is a critical decision which impacts on the company growth, companies should only involve the senior management .This exemplifies that, there are some limitations to involve employees in decision making policy.
I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided and hence my opinion is that we cannot deny the importance of involving workers in the policies, but critical aspects shall be treated at high level.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 111, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'workers'' or 'worker's'?
Suggestion: workers'; worker's
...me firms put their regulations with the workers assistance, and it is getting agreed be...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 300, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...hould only involve the senior management .This exemplifies that, there are some li...
^^
Line 5, column 302, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: This
...uld only involve the senior management .This exemplifies that, there are some limita...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, if, so, therefore, while, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1244.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36206896552 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08923950406 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 57.5553410549 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.222222222 104.977214359 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184926493236 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692026681421 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111350626897 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.114709448276 0.151781067708 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.096400005164 0.0609392437508 158% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.