cashless society
In this burgeoning epoch of science and technology, the contemporary human dwells in the world which is perennially shaped by the latest trends and approaches coming across the globe. Whether cashless society makes our life easy and reliable or not has been a bone of contention and feud for manifold years. The following paragraphs will exaggerate the propitious aspects of the aforementioned text and thus will lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, there are oodles of perspective to glimpse on this viewpoint. First and Pre-eminent there are more methods of cashless transactions such as credit and debit cards, net banking and so on. The most conspicuous one is that individuals can purchase anythings at any place with the help of online transaction. People no need to carry cash in their pockets so no make more chances to theft. Needless to say, all these merits stand in good stead as far as broadening one's horizon is concerned.
Paradoxically, on the other side of the fence an opposing case can possible be made. Radically, cyber crime has increased day by day because people have less information of online transaction. Concomitantly, card cloning is rising because individuals share their bank details and passwords with any person. However, the one who advocates this viewpoints fails to see the picture in larger context.
To conclude, after having a great deal of thoughts and deliberations with myself, I have to come to the conclusion that indeed albeit, government should organised awareness camps so that people gain more knowledge about cashless transaction.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-31 | Behnaz fallah | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 88 | view |
| 2021-07-23 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 80 | view |
| 2021-07-09 | MojtabaKarami | 85 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 478, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...tand in good stead as far as broadening ones horizon is concerned. Paradoxically, o...
^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... person. However, the one who advocates this viewpoints fails to see the picture in ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, thus, well, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21011673152 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95559551069 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68093385214 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8658525251 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.0 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7692307692 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123609209671 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0349511009626 0.0925447433944 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0754848808275 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0681977616503 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0531061923447 0.0609392437508 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.