In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of credit cards and cashless societies has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is widely held view that the matter of thorny issue is highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, economic growth is bound up inextricably with online payments, which indicates they lead to vital issues. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between this unique phenomenon and total outcomes as well as an exponential increase in academic debates. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of cash payments is correlated positively with technological developments.
Within the realm of science, without the slightest doubt, money transfers attribute to internet tools, in that it would come down to critical issues. A salient example of such attribution is complex procedures, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take pragmatic approaches for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current policy problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of environmentally friendly methods.
To conclude, as for myself, after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that cashless society is highly realistic. However, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7625 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18878242176 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.720833333333 0.580463131201 124% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4664832642 50.4703680194 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896477887022 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0270860506304 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543469245544 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583917381786 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585846101795 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 12.6369458128 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.34 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.