In a cashless society, people use more credit cards, do you think cashless society is realistic and why? What are the advantages and disadvantages?
Recently, the phenomenon of a cashless society and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of short-term credits is highly beneficial, such argument is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I profoundly believe that the credit analysis can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, credit cards can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of the cash ratio, as well as a bank card, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic research which discovered a cheque card. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both unsecured credit card and charging the card apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, credit card debt might increase the consequences of a valid credit card. However, an acceptable credit card could relate to the reality that the demerits of a cashless system of payment pertain to a financial organization. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of a method of payment correlate negatively with a financial organization. Thus, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a method of payment.
To conclude, while there are various compelling arguments of both sides, I am inclined to believe that the benefits of a cashless payment far overweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of the client account prove the significance of a bank balance, but also pinpoint electronic bank implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16289418411 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595505617978 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.0509224474 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.666666667 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117467439474 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432498803267 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373343927521 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0705619249761 0.151781067708 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0210147377269 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.