Cities are now expanding; the government should make better network for public transport or should it build more roads? Agree or disagree?
Times are changing rapidly and so are the long-held beliefs of modern cities. A recent controversy that has further flared up among the elites and intellectuals of all nations is whether some people think that Government should better network for public transport, while some disagree should it more roads. Before I came to any conclusion, I would like to shed some lights on the both views in forthcoming paragraphs.
To begin with it must be acknowledged that, more public transport saves time and wastage of money that we are spending every day for car parking. Less emissions which means less own transport in the world’s less fume and toxins from transports. For instance, public transport is the safest mode.
Thus, reasons shed enough light on the significance of more buses and trains.
On the other hand, I think roads also needed for people can use best way to go home in minutes. For example, less traffic for everyday using own mode.
This evidence declares loud and clear that public mode of transport can’t be overlooked.
It indeed goes without saying that, network for public transport more reliable than roads which save our planet and take care of public, but the dominating influence of both views should not be ignored at any cost.
- Company’s top level authorities should get their employees in decision making process. Discuss 72
- Some people think that exercise is the key to health while others feel that having a balanced diet is more important. 55
- Education is the biggest barrier in my learning-Einstein 77
- decline library day by day 85
- climate change who responsible whether govt or industries. 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 146, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun emissions is countable.
Suggestion: Fewer
...are spending every day for car parking. Less emissions which means less own transpor...
^^^^
Line 4, column 61, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'use the best'.
Suggestion: use the best
... think roads also needed for people can use best way to go home in minutes. For example...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 127, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...minutes. For example, less traffic for everyday using own mode. This evidence declares...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, thus, while, for example, for instance, i think, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1057.0 1207.87684729 88% => OK
No of words: 212.0 242.827586207 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9858490566 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54389639419 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 139.433497537 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650943396226 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 315.0 379.143842365 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.6682385133 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0909090909 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.63636363636 7.25397266985 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.12807881773 145% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312416525808 0.242375264174 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103300821357 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999706891283 0.071462118173 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135931862094 0.151781067708 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075942234249 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 87.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 78.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.