Design of building have positive or negative impact on people's life and work ?
One of the conspicuous trends of today world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that the ancient times building have come in different shapes and sizes, and many people believe that certainly affects one's life and work. The design of building render both positive and negative effects.
There is a widespread worry that this will lead to myriad concerns in one's life. Moreover I don't entirely accept this and I will explain this essay in my view point. There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. Most preponderant one is that are not sparsely dense have high raise building or skyscrapers. For instance the residential building hardly few in metres. There is poor ventilation like rooms, halls, and offices will just add vicissitudes to life. Sunlight and air lead to weakened immunity in people but can only contribute to the other hand, building with no fancy design but proper ventilation and sunlight are an austere place livable. Thanks to a wide range of advantages it offers not only one benefits more which it comes to being effective more enhance the productivity of quality of their lives much ease efficiency and convenience. Needless to say all these merits stand one is good stead as far as augmenting of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
According to the latest published in the journal of architecture, building design such as triangle can attract cosmic vigor and transform into human consumable energy. It may sound counter intuitive, a mediator does get divine revitalization by meditating in a triangle meditation room with a seat in the middle.
In the views of arguments mentioned about one can conclude that the benefits design of building can certainly improve people's professional and personal lives. And the advantages of having such architecture.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-26 | Arshdeepbatth | 80 | view |
| 2019-06-01 | Ammu helen | 55 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | Thaarika | 70 | view |
| 2019-04-27 | Thaarika | 55 | view |
| 2018-05-01 | meenutalwar | 77 | view |
- Cars come in all different shapes and sizes. Some prefer a large one, while a compact one. What are advantages and disadvantages of each type and which would you prefer? 72
- Cars come in all different shapes and sizes. Some prefer a large one, while a compact one. What are advantages and disadvantages of each type and which would you prefer? 60
- Cars come in all different shapes and sizes. Some prefer a large one, while a compact one. What are advantages and disadvantages of each type and which would you prefer? 61
- Some people think that younger employees often have more skills, knowledge and motivation than the old employees. To what extent do you agree with it? Use your experience. 85
- Journalist is one of the most difficulty job in the world. What's your opinion? 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...y people believe that certainly affects ones life and work. The design of building r...
^^^^
Line 3, column 71, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...at this will lead to myriad concerns in ones life. Moreover I dont entirely accept ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 82, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Moreover,
...l lead to myriad concerns in ones life. Moreover I dont entirely accept this and I will...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 93, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...yriad concerns in ones life. Moreover I dont entirely accept this and I will explai...
^^^^
Line 3, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in ones life. Moreover I dont entirely accept this and I will explain this essa...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, such as, in my view
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1520.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 298.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10067114094 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80431123883 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 139.433497537 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604026845638 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 379.143842365 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.3845489454 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.333333333 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8666666667 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.270432025071 0.242375264174 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0808403633887 0.0925447433944 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860914206033 0.071462118173 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17107715192 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110779415737 0.0609392437508 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.