Do you agree that the rise of artificial intelligence raises ethical concerns?
Recently, artificial intelligence rises have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it advantageous or not?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that ethical concerns are highly beneficial, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the ethical concerns standpoint, artificial intelligence issues are bound up inextricably with ethical values, which indicates they lead to both artificial intelligence problems and ethical manners. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between advanced artificial intelligence and ethical purposes as well as an exponential increase in artificial intelligence programs. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of artificial intelligence problems is correlated positively with not only ethical concerns but also artificial intelligence rises.
Within the realm of ethical concerns, without the slightest doubt, artificial intelligence issues attribute to ethical values, in that it would come down to artificial intelligence problems, ethical manners, and advanced artificial intelligence. A salient example of such attribution is ethical purposes, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take artificial intelligence programs for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint ethical manners problems. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of artificial intelligence rises.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that the advantages of artificial intelligence rises are of more significance.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-31 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-08-17 | Rafia Jawad | 88 | view |
| 2024-08-14 | Rafia Jawad | 85 | view |
| 2024-06-06 | Sridarani | 70 | view |
| 2024-05-24 | Sridarani | 69 | view |
- What can make learning a new foreign language unimportant Give your example and explanation 88
- Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need additionally funding, but others think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors.Choose which position you most a 85
- As the urban population grows traffic is heavy and public areas such as parking lots are packed What solutions do you think can address such problems 80
- As cities expanding some people claim governments should look forward creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population What s your opinion Give some examples or experien 79
- Some people point that experiential learning (i.e. learning by doing it) can work well in formal education. However, others think a traditional form of teaching is the best. Do you think experiential learning CAN WORK WELL in high schools or colleges? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 18, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'concerns'' or 'concern's'?
Suggestion: concerns'; concern's
...hroughout this essay. From the ethical concerns standpoint, artificial intelligence iss...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 5.75862068966 313% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1565.0 1207.87684729 130% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 6.08949416342 5.00649968141 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33249799018 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.7218763634 50.4703680194 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.5 104.977214359 149% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7 20.9669160288 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.9 7.25397266985 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.429064413025 0.242375264174 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.178459322876 0.0925447433944 193% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779791532031 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249846036988 0.151781067708 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0767116549473 0.0609392437508 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.1 12.6369458128 159% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 53.1260098522 39% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 15.9 6.54236453202 243% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.9458128079 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 18.34 11.5310837438 159% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 9.94827586207 176% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 10.5123152709 171% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.