Do you think cash-less society is realistic? What are the merits and demerits?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people believing that cash-less society is realistic. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain, why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that cash-less society is realistic can not also contribute to benefits of cashless economy is easier to track the black money and illegal transaction happening in the society, but also lead to numerous other benefits of various fields. Thanks to the wide rage of advantages it offers, not only can one benefits more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one is good stead, as far as augmenting their choices of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
There are some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm the potential benefits of cashless society is realistic. The primary one stems from the fact that by observing the aforementioned trend, people have not only realized its gravity, but also gauge the magnitude of it repercussions when it comes to today’s ever- changing lifestyle. Beside, it impacts on people having half knowledge of digital payments are exposed to cyber fraud far reaching indeed. Hence, it is apparent, why many are against cashless society is realistic.
In view of my arguments outlined above, one can conclude that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of cashless society is realistic are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04593639576 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80516413028 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547703180212 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 459.0 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.8735415165 50.4703680194 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.75 7.25397266985 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130435182757 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458139026421 0.0925447433944 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477008002383 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0792203706904 0.151781067708 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023891025005 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.31 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.07 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.