Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience.
These days, there is an ongoing debate among people about over packed products. Some people believe that producers should be responsible for over packing, others think that it should be controlled by consumers. I am inclined to believe that this is mainly companies’ duty. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analysing both sides of the argument.
There are several reasons why avoiding over packed products should be a producers' responsibility. One of them is that if we create some sort of solution that fits all producers, it will be much more effective than consumer based one because it can easily be traceable by governments. It can also be argued that many consumers do not have enough environmental consciousness, so we can get extended success if we create some sort of solutions via producers.
Those who argue for consumers' responsibility have a different view and say that it can be a logical way. Firstly, it is claimed that average consumer has the ability to decide which products are much more environmentally friendly than others and less harmful to nature. So, it should be customers' duty because of costumer awareness. Then, some people claim that over packed products are much more expensive than general products because they have some extra packaging. Therefore, many consumers cannot choose extra-packed products. Specifically, a study conducted by Yale University in 2015 has found that consumers are making their choice depends on their economic concerns instead of attractive packaging.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that over packing should be avoided by producers because of traceability advantages and environmental concerns. I would strongly recommend that governments should check the progress on this issue even consumer or producers held this responsibility.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | manraj123 | 11 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | dhavalpatel095 | 88 | view |
| 2018-04-08 | omer.cinpir | 77 | view |
| 2018-03-25 | Benzi | 85 | view |
- Effective learning requires time, comfort and peace, so it is impossible to combine study and employment. Study and employment distract one from another. To what extent do you think the statements are realistic? Support your opinion with examples. 77
- Nowadays a lot of offices are being built an open plan design. Why is that? Do you see this as a positive or negative development?. Discuss your opinion and support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience or observations. 75
- Age discrimination occurs when a decision is made on the basis of a person’s age. In the workplace, these are most often decisions about being employed in the first place, winning promotions or being unfairly dismissed. Should discrimination against old 55
- Some people could stay effective in their lives by doing the repetitive routine, such as eating the same diet. Do you think it can apply to everyone? 88
- Do you think consumers should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products? Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'producers'' or 'producer's'?
Suggestion: producers'; producer's
...oiding over packed products should be a producers responsibility. One of them is that if ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 64, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...arguments on both sides of the case, my personal opinion is that over packing should be avoided ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, then, therefore, while, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 37.0 20.9802955665 176% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1580.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31986531987 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99433195807 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572390572391 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.331666636 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.333333333 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.06666666667 7.25397266985 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22819681296 0.242375264174 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829041816834 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0715784434416 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139408818652 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224106392709 0.0609392437508 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.57 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.