Do you think formal written assessments in today's world to assess students’ performance is effective or not? Discuss your viewpoint on this and support your answer with examples.
These days, there is ongoing debate between people about effectiveness of formal written assignments in current era. Some people seem to be either passionate supporters or some seem to be opponents,. They may have empirical and theoretical agreements and disagreements; my view is partial on this topic.
There are several reasons why written assessments in today`s world to judge student`s performance is effective?. Most of educational institutes all around the globe are following the method of written examination to evaluate the overall performance. In other words, this method of evaluation of student`s performance is successful from ancient times. Lets take an example of school where overall performance of student is evaluated through written examination. After results , detailed mark sheet will clearly define the overall performance of student; moreover, this result will guide him about his weak areas and strong points for his future performance.
On the other hand , new innovations and technology advancements changes the educational systems. In other words, usage of gadgets like Mobile,computers and other electronic devises is increased dramatically in past two decades.; However, only 30% of world`s population is using these gadgets but the demand of technical persons is increasing. It is clear that these technicians need more practical training then written literature, moreover, their performance will only be evaluated through practical skill contests. Practical skill contests are defined their performance more accurately then written assignments and helpful for their future performance.
While there are strong arguments on both sides of coin. My personal opinion is that both written and practical assignments are required to access the performance of students.and the combination of both will evaluate the accurate performance of students and this will be beneficial for their future ventures.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 140, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s in current era. Some people seem to be either passionate supporters or some see...
^^
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
... supporters or some seem to be opponents,. They may have empirical and theoretical...
^^
Line 3, column 367, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...mance is successful from ancient times. Lets take an example of school where overall...
^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...rough written examination. After results , detailed mark sheet will clearly define...
^^
Line 5, column 18, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...future performance. On the other hand , new innovations and technology advancem...
^^
Line 5, column 64, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... innovations and technology advancements changes the educational systems. In othe...
^^
Line 5, column 143, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , computers
...ther words, usage of gadgets like Mobile,computers and other electronic devises is increas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 414, Rule ID: LESS_MORE_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'?
Suggestion: than
...echnicians need more practical training then written literature, moreover, their per...
^^^^
Line 7, column 60, Rule ID: PERSONAL_OPINION_FRIENDSHIP[1]
Message: Use simply 'opinion'.
Suggestion: opinion
...ong arguments on both sides of coin. My personal opinion is that both written and practical assi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, may, moreover, so, then, while, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 5.75862068966 278% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1670.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.88028169014 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20523924368 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573943661972 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.8720368145 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.285714286 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.64285714286 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 5.33497536946 169% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2152739016 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0790004848849 0.0925447433944 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102176546007 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118192537857 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0761778305038 0.0609392437508 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.82 11.5310837438 146% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.