In the last decade, we have witnessed numerous successful people in the area of business, technology, science, and politics. These phenomena have sparked a heated debate among the thinkers. Many proponents are of the view that native place where a person grows plays a significant role in his or her success, however, others have opposite views stating that it does not matter where a person grows, it’s the personality traits which makes them successful in life. In this article, I will analyze both sides before deriving an appropriate conclusion.
To begin with, the place where a person grew up has a tremendous influence on his life. The social, geopolitical and cultural norms of the region play a vital role in the success of the persons for achieving their objectives and dreams. For instance, the majority of tech entrepreneurs are from the USA due to an excellent educational institute and the ecosystem of the land promoting and nurturing the talent. Moreover, the liberal laws of the land have a profound impact on the success ratio of the person.
On the other hand, although, local dynamics play a pivotal role in the success of the person, many leaders in the world are born out of poorest and difficult areas due to their vision and personal traits like leadership. For example, Nelson Mandla and Gandhi are the world's most successful and influential leaders comes from the adverse part of the word.
In conclusion, from the above example, it is evident that local ecosystem and place are important in achieving objectives in life, however, I believe it is the personal traits which make leaders apart from others and makes them a successful person, hence, it weighs down the place in comparison.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 307, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'leaders'' or 'leader's'?
Suggestion: leaders'; leader's
... worlds most successful and influential leaders comes from the adverse part of the word...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, apart from, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1440.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 287.0 242.827586207 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01742160279 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11595363751 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68615580162 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550522648084 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 457.2 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.0399342719 50.4703680194 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.909090909 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0909090909 20.9669160288 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.9090909091 7.25397266985 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136331696889 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544341674887 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758915277545 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0880165920251 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0336647280597 0.0609392437508 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.