Do you think the place where a person grew up helps him/her in accomplishing goals in life? Do you agree or disagree?

In this modern era, we have witnessed massive movement among all section of society either for pursuing their dream careers or desired employment. Experts are debating over this phenomenon. Proponents are supporting and favoring such migration for embracing mammoth growth and achieving objectives in life, however, others have opposite views stating that many great historians have achieved paramount success in life by working hard at the place they grew up. I somewhat agree with the former view.

To begin with, the major reasons for venturing out or traveling from the once birthplace is mainly due to lack of academic institutes or professional opportunities. For instance, most of my friends went abroad for achieving their career objectives due to fewer and lower paying jobs in home town. Moreover, some students are going out due to not availability of colleges or universities in the areas of their fields of interest.

On the other hand, there are certain people who have achieved their objectives in life by staying and struggling at the place they grew up. They have turned adversities into the opportunities by their hard work. For example, Mr. Ambani of the
Reliance Industry has reached to top by persistently sticking to goals, and hence, developed the whole ecosystem for cognitive and holistic development.

In conclusion, from the above examples, I am inclined to believe that a person should try hard and try all the options before leaving the place they grew up.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ard work. For example, Mr. Ambani of the Reliance Industry has reached to top by ...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, moreover, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1256.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21161825726 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7671153562 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647302904564 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 390.6 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5051894801 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.181818182 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.81818181818 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08952181053 0.242375264174 37% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331060296478 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046166237402 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0516072062144 0.151781067708 34% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0429458187919 0.0609392437508 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.53 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.