Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? pros and cons?
The importance of video communication of doctors and patients which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this nation. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be a more rational. This essay will further elaborate positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that if any patient is in emergency they communicate with doctor with the help of video call. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that if we are pain we can easily give advised from international doctors or experienced doctor. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that communicate with doctor on video sometime doctors are misguide and we get more sick. Besides, doctors are not clear seen through the video call so patient should go to doctor and get advice. Hence, it is apparent why many against this trend.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of patient communicate with doctor through video are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-13 | manraj123 | 77 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | Jaskaransingh11 | 79 | view |
| 2019-09-13 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | Prince Singh | 55 | view |
| 2018-06-17 | mojtaba1980 | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...but one of the most alarming one is that communicate with doctor on video sometim...
^^
Line 5, column 230, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'misguided'.
Suggestion: misguided
...th doctor on video sometime doctors are misguide and we get more sick. Besides, doctors ...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 255.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.20392156863 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76938833071 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.7037586921 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.583333333 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254160072396 0.242375264174 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899537051673 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102116911346 0.071462118173 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17159674646 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0487580480059 0.0609392437508 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.95 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.