Environment pollution is too alarming to be manged by individuals. Real change can be made at the government level. what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the environment pollution and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the number of the soil pollution is highly rewarding, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that natural resources can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the marine pollution standpoint, trash can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the smoke of the factories, as well as water pollution, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the public system. Thus, beneficial ramifications of greenhouse gases and effects apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of the industrial pollution, smoky atmosphere might exacerbate the already catastrophic consequences of the renewable energy resources. Moreover, fundamental aspects of public transportation system relate to this reality that demerits of development society pertain to the fossil fuels. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the nuclear energy is correlated negatively with clear energy. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the solar energy.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the air pollution far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a source of pollution prove the significance of carbon monoxide, but also pinpoint the carbon dioxide effects implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1483.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.63878326996 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21819039382 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638783269962 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.7100602982 50.4703680194 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.583333333 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11973499026 0.242375264174 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0380629831349 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385218628933 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654662260884 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0455001909884 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.