Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
In this tech-savvy world, it is irrefutable that practical experience is an effective and modern way of teaching. Some people believe that practical learning is far better than traditional formal learning, whereas, another group of people holds the opposite view and believing in formal education. This essay will discuss why an experimental education is imperative for better professional career and clearing the fundamentals and basics of any subject.
To begin with, practical knowledge is important because it helps in developing and building our professional career. We don’t do any theoretical tasks in our professional life, we only do practical tasks so learning gained from practical knowledge helps us here. To cite with an example, dentists’ book knowledge will not help him to cure any disease of a patient. Hence, preponderance should be given to practical learning during studies.
Second most striking reason would be the understanding of fundamentals of a particular subject. In other words, you learn quite quickly, when you are doing something, in comparison to reading from books. Reading books are boring and you tend to lose interest over the period of time. It is believed that practical learning remains in your mind forever, against perishable books knowledge. Thus, a clear understanding of fundamentals and basics are essential.
To recapitulate, this essay discussed why practical learning outweighs over books learning. In my opinion, knowledge gained through practical experience will conspicuously aid in your professional career and develop your basics.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | jashan randhawa | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2020-01-25 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 269, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... and you tend to lose interest over the period of time. It is believed that practical learning...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, second, so, thus, whereas, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1365.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66390041494 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12369598832 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7994352408 50.4703680194 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.5 104.977214359 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2142857143 20.9669160288 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0738475113904 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030088150789 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0456642174384 0.071462118173 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0487665300424 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207971764641 0.0609392437508 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.25 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.94827586207 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.