Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting. Agree or disagree?
At the out set, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that Government efforts to support art and music is totally a burden and a dire need is required to reduced investments on these projects. Critics, however claim that spending some of the budget on art and music industry is beneficial for artists to provide platform for young talents. I, personally think that this statement is more realistic and worth to believe.
At the out set, there are myriad of arguments associated with spending on art and music to promote art industry. Firstly, the most cospicuous one stem from the fact that artists and musicians have played a key role in this society to spread love and represent peace and fresh mind. Therefore, government support for these young talents is quiet beneficial to showcase their talent in front of this society. This effort would be beneficial for their career perspectives and introduces them to the world. In this senerio, promoting art galleries and institutes are the most suitable platform for them.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that governments little effort for art and drama industry is the way to open new horizon in front of us. As a prime example, in this contemporary world, coke studio is quiet vast platform for youngsters to promote new talents on social media and networking channels. Thus, government’s this effort is not at all a burden for society.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that promoting art and music is not only beneficial for artists but also for nation’s economy. Thus, ideas, that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...s. Critics, however claim that spending some of the budget on art and music industry is ben...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, thus, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11071428571 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78809193404 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546428571429 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.851471384 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.076923077 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5384615385 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.69230769231 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0993719373071 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0378223280554 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.041182181454 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.06581717891 0.151781067708 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0357081266253 0.0609392437508 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.