Recently, the phenomenon of handling job and studies has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the advantage of being successful in both the job and studies is highly beneficial, the disadvantage of such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I highly believe that handling the career along with studies can be a plus, and I will investigate that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, handling work and study at the same time can provide societies with noticeable effects that are rooted in the fact that merits, as well as advantages of recruiting educated employees, are crucial. According to my own experience, I performed an academic experiment that discovered the relationship between professional job opportunity and university grades. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of simultaneous focus on the job and education are visible.
From a scientific point of view, having both job and study can provide the community with negative impacts that are related to the reality that the demerits of facing difficulties at workplace are remarkable. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university described the role of time management related issues. Hence, the predicted outcomes of distractions enhances by doing both work and study are noticeable.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of a successful handling of job and studies far outweigh the drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of solving financial problems of studies prove the significance of successful job conditions, but also pinpoint possible implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1474.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56226415094 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.21328233109 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 468.9 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5804755169 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.0 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.25397266985 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381568354258 0.242375264174 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128596189892 0.0925447433944 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0683779049381 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213332813934 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407585093219 0.0609392437508 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.37 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.