What is the best invention of last 100 years?and explain why?
Recently, the phenomenon of the best invention and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the new invention is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that most important creation can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the design standpoint, the computer can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that patent, as well as device, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered cultural invention. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both creativity and social invention apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of technology, imagination might increase the consequences of the modern device. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the process of creating something related to this reality that the demerits of laptop pertain to mobile. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of cell-phone is correlated negatively with the social invention. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of genius.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the new invention of smart-phone far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of gadget prove the significance of communicating, but also pinpoint digital processing implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...te. Although contested by many that the new invention is highly beneficial, such issue is reg...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: NEW_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'invention'.
Suggestion: invention
...oundly believe that the benefits of the new invention of smart-phone far outweigh its drawbac...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1364.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.61316872428 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27532722998 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.662551440329 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.2412368514 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0669882080853 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0228340693084 0.0925447433944 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0378948546961 0.071462118173 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375253349083 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0328472232726 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.