Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this?
Surely there has been no time where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals shopping malls has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether it should be replaced or not. I will elaborate both sides of this notion in the further writing.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of shop from large shopping malls. The first and foremost, masses like to buy things under one roof. To cite an example, if we need different product we should buy thing from large building because we can get all things which we need. Moreover, malls also provide a lot of facilities to their customers such as, discount on product and parking and so on. Individuals utilized their money on good quality product that works for long time.
On the contrary, small shops have also ample merit. Firstly, those are at reasonable price as compared to malls so poor middle class people can afford it. Due to large malls, some individuals snatch their bread and butter of retailer after that they have to face a lot of troubles regarding their life.
To conclude, I firmly believe that malls are good source of shopping it provide huge chunk of facilities to customers but people should buy some things from shops with which shopkeepers can run their house without any difficulty.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 73, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'provides'?
Suggestion: provides
...at malls are good source of shopping it provide huge chunk of facilities to customers b...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...un their house without any difficulty.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, regarding, so, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1162.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86192468619 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42482246974 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635983263598 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3244712303 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3846153846 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.25397266985 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156472414475 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555170177311 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0489247493837 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921783882846 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00724566100421 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 12.6369458128 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.91 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 55.0591133005 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 61.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.