Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals and human life.
The implication of logging of rain forests serious problem for humans and animals, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I partially agree with this statement and this will further discussed before reaching a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that some countries like India, Russia and so on sales the forests trees as well as their economy mostly depend on forests. For example, 70% economy of India depend on forest. Therefore, the negative impact of logging rain forests undeniable.
On the flip side, some people adopt an opposing views and tend to believe that logging of forest can be addressed with some positive facets as well as there are numerous facts in the favour of that, but the most predominant one stems from that due to logging of rain forest more diseases are spreading here and there. Moreover, pollution rate is growing rapidly that it is very dangerous for animals and humans. As an illustration, a survey shows that in the United States there are more people are died.
In the nutshell, according to above analysis, it can be concluded that logging of rain forest is very dangerous of humans and animals. It can be predicted that in the near further.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-30 | gurhusan singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-07-30 | jashan randhawa | 77 | view |
- What criteria should be used to decide how much people are paid for different occupations 51
- Companies use advertisements to influence people to buy things sometimes which they don't need. Give your opinion about this practice. 77
- Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals and human life. 77
- Xenophobia has accelerated rapidly in the western countries. According to you what solution can be proposed by government & individuals. 80
- Smoking should be banned in all public places. do you agree or disagree with this statement? 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 331, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'discuss'
Suggestion: discuss
...th this statement and this will further discussed before reaching a logical conclusion. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99173553719 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51868232854 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.566115702479 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 379.8 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.4517044959 50.4703680194 161% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.818181818 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213172233891 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0812419115091 0.0925447433944 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0887664079256 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126107255941 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131094807616 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.