Mandatory electoral voting systems function better than free choice voting systems.
Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with this statement. Support your point of views with reasons and examples.
In many countries, voting has been compulsory for all citizens. Many people believe that the obligatory system to vote on an election day is comparatively better than the voter’s own choice to cast their vote. This essay will discuss the reasons why compulsory voting is advantageous than free voting.
To begin with, mandatory voting system has many benefits over free voting and the most influential one is that it leads to higher voter turnout. For example, countries like Australia, Greece and France always maintain high proportion of voters on the day of elections because of the strict rules and regulations regarding vote casting. Therefore, it is imperative that the lower voter turn out cannot reflect the decision of the whole country or the majority and can lead to myriad of concerns by selecting wrong people.
Similarly, compulsory voting system can also help to reduce corruption like rigging in polls by political parties. It has widely seen that, in case of low turnout of voters, opponents try to cash the un casted votes on their names in order to gain the clear majority. Hence, it is clear that necessary voting can play a pivotal role in preventing the wrongdoing during elections.
This essay discussed how compulsory voting system increases the voters turn out and decreases the chances of rigging in elections. In my opinion, enforced voting is far more beneficial for our society as compared to the system that gives voters the choice to vote or not.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pponents try to cash the un casted votes on their names in order to gain the clea...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, regarding, similarly, so, therefore, for example, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1248.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 246.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07317073171 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64416442866 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60162601626 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 391.5 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9577346017 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.454545455 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3636363636 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.25397266985 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265092443073 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110407313739 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761237592538 0.071462118173 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168041027351 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618795095604 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.