Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the owns causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Essay topics:

Many people believe that the increasing number of cars in cities is the biggest source of pollution and waste. Others think that industries are the owns causing pollution. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in using cars by people. Some number of people have interest to go long drive and another use car because of craze. However, there are many pros and cons and I will explain why in this essay.

There are number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that number of cars are launching in markets day by day. Moreover, people influence about technology by television advertisement, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chance of prosperity and excellence is concern.

There are, however, some pitfalls that can easily overwhelm potential benefit of growing number of car ratio and industries wastage. The primary one stems from that fact that by observing the aforementioned trends, people have not realised its gravity, but also gauged the magnitude of its repercussions when it comes to today’s ever-changing lifestyle. Besides, its impact on surround of people are far-changing ignore.

In view of the arguments outline above, one can conclude that the benefit of buying things from local shops are indeed too great to ignore.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, however, if, moreover, so

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1227.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07024793388 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8041902014 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607438016529 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4670201845 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.25 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.75 7.25397266985 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11042153727 0.242375264174 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0431492001142 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0297406751838 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0639240716845 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247250595261 0.0609392437508 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.