Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In today’s fast moving world, media have become the major source for providing information about all domains, which makes people to live up to date as well as knowledgeable. However, some concede that media’s report on the lifestyle of celebrities and popular people can have many detrimental impacts on the thinking process of young minds. But, I partially accord with the statement.
To begin with, news has become a part of daily feed which in turn has made people cognizant, but certain news has a negative influence on the mindset of children on account of manifold reasons. Firstly, publicity is a major tool for the celebrities whereby they get more followers as well as build their own brand, consequently there are some celebrities who gain fame and come under limelight by doing things, which are not pertinent for the society and children, therefore such reports should not be taken into account by media. On the top of that, lifestyle of celebrities can lure young people to easily deviate from their career aspirations, which is very erroneous for the development and growth of children. For instance, it has been found in many surveys that many children imitate the negative stuff, which celebrities often portray in the movies, which is again regressive.
On the other hand, reporting on celebrities can be beneficial for children owing to myriad reasons. Firstly, there are many celebrities, who have achieved the zenith of success by their sheer determination and hard work, thus coverage of such celebrities can be a source of motivation and encouragement for the children, which is partly fruitful. In addition, children can also learn about certain things such as communication skills, etiquettes and so on, by seeing the reports, which are often shown by various media houses.
In Conclusion, I opine that media should play a positive role by disseminating valuable information and must try to avoid spreading worthless content.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 14, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: ,  
...various media houses. In Conclusion, I opine that media should play a positi...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 5.94088669951 236% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1650.0 1207.87684729 137% => OK
No of words: 314.0 242.827586207 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25477707006 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9667788843 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 139.433497537 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576433121019 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 501.3 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1168175009 50.4703680194 135% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5454545455 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 14.7272727273 7.25397266985 203% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226575165337 0.242375264174 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896231690797 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368468611497 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126748217754 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593530310479 0.0609392437508 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 53.1260098522 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.