Medical technology can increase the human life expectancy. Is it curse or blessing?
n the last few decades, there has been a great upsurge in the field of medical science. As a result, the average living age of a person has increased to a great extent. Many people consider it as a blessing; while other opines that it is a curse for our society. My opinion, however, coincides with the latter notion. This essay will elaborate on the viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that increasing life expectancy has resulted in a higher ratio of the world population. As a result, the resources namely food and land are depleting at faster rates. For example, the increasing number of people has created a burden on the farmers to grow more food crops, due to which the deforestation is occurring at an alarming rate. Also, it is creating a problem of land scarcity for housing. Therefore, it is clear that this trend is causing devastating effects on our society.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that it has generated a colossal of pressure over the governments around the world. They have to provide additional grants and medical care to elderly people. Not only it is costing millions of dollars but also depleting the funds from other major issues. For instance, the governments have to provide the old age pension and allowances to the growing population, which could be used in educational or research purposes. Hence, this increasing life expectancy is creating a burden that could have serious consequences.
In view of the arguments outlined above, it can be concluded that medical technology has increased the life expectancy of people, but it is harming our society that results are too dire to be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: N
n the last few decades, there has been a ...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, as a result, to a great extent
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86531986532 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77933840458 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.6708451727 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4705882353 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164279308375 0.242375264174 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0423473341436 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0585917722531 0.071462118173 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10729866417 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0647321192951 0.0609392437508 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 12.6369458128 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 11.5310837438 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.32886699507 109% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 55.0591133005 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.