Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Essay topics:

Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree

Healthcare is a fundamental need of any country as it is psychological well-being. Government should spend some amount of budget in research of vaccine and medication to treat people from various diseases. These days there is an ongoing debate between the society of people who think that technology is benefiting health care to enhance life expectancy. In this essay, I shall be analyzing advantages and disadvantages.

At the outset, technology has myriad of benefits to treat people from fatal diseases such as cancer, kidney disease etc. This helps people to treat themselves to live longer life span. In addition to this, elder people can spend more valuable time with their grandchildren and this will benefit kids to understand the value of life that old people used to spend in past. There are professionals like teachers, researchers, mathematicians etc, who are contributing towards the advancement of technology to improve healthcare.

On the other hand, technology is playing a vital role in healthcare to make people live longer which results in making people to work for longer period of time. This means that people will retire late and younger people might not get job. This will lead to an unemployment. I believe that government should provide free medical facilities to older people.

In conclusion, longer life is expected by everyone so I feel the advantages outweigh the disadvantages.

Votes
Average: 7.6 (4 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-14 Rafia Jawad 85 view
2024-04-25 Rafia Jawad 55 view
2024-01-22 topraveesh 88 view
2023-04-21 padim30987 75 view
2022-11-13 fereshteh.r 77 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user nav12345 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 363, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the past'?
Suggestion: in the past
...e of life that old people used to spend in past. There are professionals like teachers,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 146, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...lts in making people to work for longer period of time. This means that people will retire lat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, well, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1191.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26991150442 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98104343124 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62389380531 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1891395509 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.6153846154 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3846153846 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0954559900044 0.242375264174 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0338400449995 0.0925447433944 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294927405902 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0610245707039 0.151781067708 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153989953271 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.