Nowadays many places of natural beauty such as beaches, lakes, and mountains are getting littered with plastic bags, cans, bottles and other garbage. Why do you think this is happening? What can be done in order to prevent it?
Give your opinion including reasons and examples from your own experience.
The disposable things we use often pollute our nature, for instance we can see these litters are scattered everywhere in almost every tourist places. I think this happened due to the increasing use of disposable items and even more due to our mis-commitment with the environment. To control this the government has to take strong steps. This essay will discuss by putting forward some of my beliefs.
First I blame to our fast lifestyle. The reason behind increasing use of disposable items is our fast paced lives. We are used to use & dispose of these cheap items like cans or plastic bags. Forgetting our responsibility towards nature, we often throw these here and there littering the public places. We are showing same kind of a behavior in all the places and thus we pollute the areas of natural beauties like lakes, gardens, mountains etc.
Moreover, our sense of responsibility become low, most of us are not at all have commitment to our nature, we forgot "Cleanliness is next to Godliness". Our kids are learning what they are seeing in their day to day life. If we litter our home or environment then our kids also paint the same picture outside. We need some immediate measure to control this pollution and in my belief only the government can do that. The government should keep proper place for garbage disposal at regular interval.
The government should display social message to keep the public places clean. Afterall cleanliness will motivate public to keep the surrounding clean.
At the end recapitulating all the arguements I can say it is us, the government and our mis-commitment are the reasons behind the littering of public natural beautiful places. This essay also discussed the reasons & how to control the pullotion.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[5]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'used to using'.
Suggestion: used to using
...e items is our fast paced lives. We are used to use & dispose of these cheap items like can...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 324, Rule ID: KIND_OF_A[1]
Message: Don't include 'a' after a classification term. Use simply 'kind of'.
Suggestion: kind of
... the public places. We are showing same kind of a behavior in all the places and thus we ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 446, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ties like lakes, gardens, mountains etc. Moreover, our sense of responsibility be...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 79, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...essage to keep the public places clean. Afterall cleanliness will motivate public to kee...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, moreover, so, then, thus, as to, for instance, i think, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 20.9802955665 186% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02730375427 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90347640545 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546075085324 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5702821699 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8333333333 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2777777778 20.9669160288 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 7.25397266985 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115836060401 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389921564296 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0327346034361 0.071462118173 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0685504110079 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0288207657211 0.0609392437508 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 12.6369458128 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 53.1260098522 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.32886699507 91% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 55.0591133005 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.