Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the accountability of parents towards every act of their children. Some people think that parents should not be blamed for the actions of their offsprings, while others maintain that that parents are responsible for every good or bad deed of their child. This essay will discuss that why parents should be held legally answerable for every action of their child.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments associated with the legal liability of parents towards the actions of their children. Firstly, the most conspicuous is that parents have a very pivotal role and responsibility in the upbringing of their children. Therefore, every action exhibited by the child manifests the teaching and actions of his parents. As a matter of fact, it is quite evident that parents being the sole responsible in imparting every thing to their child should be held accountable for their actions.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet of this argument that proponents are not cognizant is that children being in the development phase are like sponge and absorb every thing from their parents. Not only they imitate every action of their parents but also negligence of parents astray them from the right path. As an example, famous Hollywood actor Jackie Chan publically accepted his negligence and apologized for indulgment of his son in drugs and other bad activities. Thus, parents having extreme responsibiltiy should be held for children’s actions.
To recapitualte, foregoing discussion propounds that owing to the extreme responsibility bestowed on parents for development and upbringing of their children, they should be legally held answerable for every action of their child.
- a groupe of people like to spend money rather save it why they do this what are the avantages and disadvantages 73
- Does video communication with doctor help patients to cure any disease? Pros & Cons? 80
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 65
- Most people in what are known as the developed nations have homes full of gadgets and labor-saving devices, from vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to the latest in computer technology. Some people claim that despite all these labor-saving devices, we seem t 11
- Do you think the consumer should avoid over packed products or it is the responsibility of the producer to avoid extra packaging of products?” Give your views or any relevant example with your own experience. 77
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, thus, while, as a matter of fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 20.9802955665 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1490.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34050179211 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82302607852 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.505376344086 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 451.8 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9188203555 50.4703680194 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.166666667 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.25 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.08333333333 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356833727424 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167843865433 0.0925447433944 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115987702063 0.071462118173 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272655532934 0.151781067708 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393873039407 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.