- Parents should be held responsible for their children’s acts. What is your opinion? Support it with personal examples.
In this present era growing modernization has caused upsurge in juvenile delinquency. Some people opine that their guardian should be held responsible for any anti social behaviour . I strongly agree to the given notion and my opinion is discussed in following paragraphs.
There are a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that, giving proper knowledge and guidance to ones peer is foremost duty of parents. Teaching them to behave in decent way can only be done by the guardian. For example, if a teenager is caught in the act of shoplifting or any such other activities his parent should strongly condemn it and make aware of the consequences, so that it should be repeated in future. Hence it is apparent that if youngsters continue to indulge in such acts, then parents are the one who are accountable.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that, there are myriad of incidents of road accidents in which mostly are under age. Not only, they get seriously injured, but also prove fatal for others. Giving permission to drive vehicle without proper training is fault of both mother and father. For instance many times let their pupil drive motor bikes to school just because they have hectic schedule, which also illegal as the riders are underage. Needless to say, if someone gets hurt in such act, then parents are the one who should be punished.
In view of arguments, outlined above one can conclude that the way in which children behave in society is just because of their parents, therefore in any kind of misconduct by them guardians should be held responsible.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 181, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...esponsible for any anti social behaviour . I strongly agree to the given notion an...
^^
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'deluges'?
Suggestion: deluges
...n following paragraphs. There are a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 438, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...equences, so that it should be repeated in future. Hence it is apparent that if youngster...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 449, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...o that it should be repeated in future. Hence it is apparent that if youngsters conti...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, so, then, therefore, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1347.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 275.0 242.827586207 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89818181818 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62167413656 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.621818181818 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9611758883 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2142857143 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218594689215 0.242375264174 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.063253971209 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0696361095745 0.071462118173 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133410996402 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0322655236587 0.0609392437508 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.