Problems and benefits for high school study plays and works of theaters written centuries ago.
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals problems and benefits for high schools study plays and work of theaters written centuries ago has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussions. People have always been intrigued to analyze and explain this essay discuss positive and negative side of this approach with example.
On the positive side, I would like to say that this plays will makes us aware of ancient heritage and culture. When student plays us they well know about their culture or ancient time. Furthermore, student also know about their lifestyle what they wear also know about their cooking. Students also learned from these plays what type of thinking ability of people of ancient time. Moreover, students also know ways of their lifestyle.
On the negative side, I would like to say that this plays will miss-guide the students. These plays and work of theaters written centuries ago negative effect on students. Furthermore, students try some of the wrong traditions and they can destroy their carrier. I would like to give an example; Sati movement. This is bad effect on students if student plays this drama in theaters they can behave like them and destroy their carrier.
In the conclusion, I would like to say that old theaters plays show negative and positive side of our history and it is upto students and their parents to choose which they want to follow.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 64, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'make'
Suggestion: make
... would like to say that this plays will makes us aware of ancient heritage and cultur...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 198, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... on students. Furthermore, students try some of the wrong traditions and they can destroy t...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, moreover, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 10.5418719212 47% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.75862068966 35% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94861660079 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43269634966 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 139.433497537 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.501976284585 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 385.2 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3696145866 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.4285714286 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.92857142857 7.25397266985 40% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.235861866528 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917827966752 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.168919864718 0.071462118173 236% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14688008731 0.151781067708 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111074409554 0.0609392437508 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 12.6369458128 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.13 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.