In recent years some websites have appeared which allow students to grade their teachers. Some people believe that this is a good idea, while others think that these websites give power to the wrong people.
Choose which position you most agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observations or reading.
With the advancement of technologies, students can now provide feedback to their teachers through certain websites. While many people argue that this is can cause an adverse effect, others appreciate this new method of giving feedback. This essay will discuss why grading the teachers by the student could be a sinister act.
With the assistance of these sites, the students can evaluate their teachers in good and bad ways. Many students tend to grow grudge among their teachers for small punishments and detentions. As a result, these students now have a chance to take their revenge on the teachers who gave the punishment. However, the professor has done a good job in correcting their students. For instance, a science professor in Germany was harassed by her student for suspending him from the class. Resultantly, the student has enough power and can leverage the career of the teachers.
Many young people are mischievous during their college and school days. These troublesome students often create trouble for their personal fun. Furthermore, this naughty act can be very detrimental to the teacher's career. As an illustration, a recent survey suggests that naughty students often paint graffiti on their school's walls imitating and describing bad about their mentors. Obviously, if this behavior continues during the online feedback sessions then it will be a nightmare for the teacher.
This essay discussed the ways in which students giving feedback to their teachers will have a negative impact. In my opinion, students should not have to power to assess their professors, as we cannot take those feedback as a justified and dignified one.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 207, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this feedback' or 'those feedbacks'?
Suggestion: this feedback; those feedbacks
...ess their professors, as we cannot take those feedback as a justified and dignified one.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, so, then, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 20.9802955665 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1397.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25187969925 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70033959125 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575187969925 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 406.8 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.8727228857 50.4703680194 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3125 104.977214359 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.9669160288 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.1875 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210672013635 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.077979396545 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407767292393 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14069274971 0.151781067708 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237523759361 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 53.1260098522 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.