Obesity has been linked to excessive sugar consumption. Some people believe that sugary drinks should be taxed to dissuade people from drinking them while others think that a tax is unnecessary and that public education is the best way to decrease sugar consumption.
An excess amount of sugar consumption leads to detrimental health diseases like obesity. While some people think that a proper education is required to minimize the intake of sugary substances, others maintain that heavy tax must be imposed on sugary soft drinks to prevent people from buying it. This essay will discuss why the necessity of both the opinion is required to fight against obesity.
We cannot eradicate the consumption of sugary eatables completely, but we can educate the people who consume it on a daily basis. Government and educational institution should conduct campaigns to promote the severity of consuming sugar in creatives ways. Furthermore, these campaigns should be advertised in cinema halls and other public places. These promotions will help the citizens to avoid the intake of excess sugary eatable. For instance, the government of Denmark educates the causes of obesity and detrimental effects of consuming sugary drinks. As a result of public education, we could reduce the sugar consumption.
The government should impose hefty taxes on companies that sell sugary drinks. As the taxes on these drinks are high, the average cost of the drink will be increased. This prevents people from buying and consuming sugary drinks. Furthermore, the government should provide discounts to shops that don't sell these drinks which will encourage the shop-keepers to stop selling these sugary products.
There are a plethora of harsh effect in consuming sugary products. In my opinion, a combination of public awareness and a strict law will decrease the consumption of sugary drinks which will eventually reduce the obesity percentage in a country.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... should provide discounts to shops that dont sell these drinks which will encourage ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, so, while, for instance, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1416.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38403041825 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.754106598 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536121673004 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 446.4 379.143842365 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.379030454 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.4 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 7.25397266985 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355117672992 0.242375264174 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112577433678 0.0925447433944 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783742189958 0.071462118173 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.207643342878 0.151781067708 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0595665410148 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.