The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.

Essay topics:

The right amount of motivation and practice can teach one better than the training given to him in classrooms by teachers.

Nowadays, many people choose self-study through motivation to achieve their goals, which has been proved being more efficient than any teaching technique. This essay will discuss some points why this is a trusted practice.
To begin with, motivation is the most powerful weapon which human beings have to learn and achieve any goal. This feeling is capable of giving directions and self-confidence turning the learning process more enjoyable. For example, university students who keep focused on academic lectures searching for detailed information on their practical classes. Certainly, for these universities, there are no barriers in the process of learning.
In addition, practical classes are said to be the exact way to perfection. When practising students tend to try different strategies to learn, which leads to finding the richest sources of knowledge and also beyond the boundaries of limited classrooms activities. For example, high school learners who create practical training after hours to reinforce chemistry classes. Obviously, they are able to reach perfection through the practice.
This essay discussed why motivation and practice are the best way to enlarge knowledge. Self-confidence and limitless practising drive students to perfection. In my opinion, I strongly agree that motivation and practice are more effective than any conventional class.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, for example, in addition, in my opinion, to begin with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 6.10837438424 16% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1172.0 1207.87684729 97% => OK
No of words: 204.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74509803922 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95252711729 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 139.433497537 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656862745098 0.580463131201 113% => OK
syllable_count: 348.3 379.143842365 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1045774928 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1538461538 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6923076923 20.9669160288 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23076923077 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 6.9802955665 186% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130483022538 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425140133071 0.0925447433944 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431847122312 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0823611259822 0.151781067708 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345991314463 0.0609392437508 57% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.77 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.