Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think?

Essay topics:

Technological access to online music and the like should be free or paid. What do you think?

The importance of providing online music which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate both positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.

There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that online music provide help to struggling singers and composers, so that they learn myriad things from new technology. Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that poor individuals can also have access to music.Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.

However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that it reduces market value and popularity of a composed music. Besides, it decreases motivation of singers. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.

According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of providing online shopping are instrumental indeed. nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.

Votes
Average: 8.5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-19 Shruti gupta radhika 85 view
2019-06-27 harry J 82 view
2019-06-27 Navneet dhillon 55 view
2019-06-27 jashan randhawa 77 view
2019-04-24 zjaved 80 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 336, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Needless
...dividuals can also have access to music.Needless to say, all these merits stand in a goo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 152, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Nevertheless
...nline shopping are instrumental indeed. nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1226.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37719298246 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8344058586 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618421052632 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 380.7 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.7092267443 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.454545455 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7272727273 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.81818181818 7.25397266985 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.099960376677 0.242375264174 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0376412431715 0.0925447433944 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0345091338808 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0636751105393 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0291994915135 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.5310837438 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.