some countries have free health services. However, some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services.
One of the most conspicuous trends of today’s world is a colossal upsurge in the number of people who believing that some countries have free health services. However, some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services. There is a widespread worry that this will only lead to a myriad of concerns in one’s life. However, I do not entirely accept this and I will explain why in this essay.
There are a number of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one is that some countries have free health services can not only contribute to some people who claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health service, but also lead to numerous other benefits in various fields. Thanks to the wide range of advantages it offers, not only can one benefit more when it comes to being effective, but they can also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives, with much ease, efficacy and convenience. Needless to say, all these merits stand one in good stead, as far as augmenting their chances of prosperity and excellence is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of the aforementioned propositioned is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides, only when one follows such a system, can they broaden their horizons, thus learning such essential attributes as responsibility, dedication and perseverence. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of some countries have free health services. However, some people claim that those who live unhealthy lives should not receive free health services.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefit of some countried have free health service are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, however, if, so, thus
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 5.94088669951 252% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99322033898 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64479781317 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.580463131201 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.3412048234 50.4703680194 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.307692308 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6923076923 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 7.25397266985 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.53739059443 0.242375264174 222% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.218910449449 0.0925447433944 237% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.269163364549 0.071462118173 377% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.360647458147 0.151781067708 238% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.047203275685 0.0609392437508 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.31 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.