Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
Recently, the phenomenon of some languages is increasingly spoken in countries and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of decreasing the usage of others is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that different languages in different countries can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, increasing in the usage of some languages in countries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of declining rapidly some languages as well as increasing the other ones are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, I performed an academic experiment which discovered common languages. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both increasing and decreasing rapidly apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, some languages are common in most countries might increase the consequences of other countries. Moreover, fundamental aspects of the positive impact could relate to this reality that the demerits of negative effects pertain to spoken languages. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of using other languages is correlated negatively with the rapid increase. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of languages.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefit of increasing the use of some languages far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of countries around the world prove the significance of rapid decline in other languages, but also various implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-26 | gracespeakss1 | 11 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | gracespeakss1 | 11 | view |
| 2021-11-26 | gracespeakss1 | 11 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
| 2021-10-18 | sahar.sharifi.1984 | 85 | view |
- Should marketing in companies which produce consumer goods like food and clothing place emphasis on reputation of the company or short term strategies like discount and special offers Why 85
- In our technological world the number of new inventions has been increasing Please describe a new invention and determine whether it will bring advantages or disadvantages 85
- The disadvantages of tourism in less developed countries are as great as the advantages What is your opinion 88
- Television has two roles to inform and to entertain people Explain which of these roles you see as more important To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way Support your point of view with details from your 85
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of others is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 85
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 526, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ct to presume the preconceived notion of languages. To conclude, while there a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1553.0 1207.87684729 129% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60649819495 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16375688213 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.570397111913 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 495.0 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.0109942512 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.416666667 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.507915754649 0.242375264174 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148877030877 0.0925447433944 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912974675367 0.071462118173 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283640387698 0.151781067708 187% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0356346639306 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.55 11.5310837438 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.14 8.32886699507 122% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 55.0591133005 171% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.