Some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce air pollution. However, others argue that there are other ways that are more effective.
Discuss both views and give your own opinion
Air pollution is a problem that should be taken seriously. There are various effective measures that can be taken to reduce air pollution. One view is that some people believe that car-free days are effective ways to reduce pollution. While encouraging people not to use cars are good for the environment in my opinion I also believe that there are more effective ways.
On one hand, car-free days are considered effective because in today’s world there is a high usage of transportation, as a measure people will travel car-free for one day not using cars to reach their destination rather they would find alternative ways like walking, cycling, etc. Or they can make use of public transportation. This would prevent the amount of smoke and gas mixing in the air that causes pollution.
On the other hand, I believe there are more effective ways to reduce air pollution. For example, burning coal and other fossil fuels can be prohibited, reducing the no of industries and factories in cities, recycling and reusing materials like plastic, and the use of air conditioners can be reduced as it is said that air conditioners also contribute to air pollution. Banning the usage of cars for only one day can’t be the best solution for reducing pollution.
In conclusion, although car-free days can help to reduce air pollution people should also follow other ways and methods that contribute to the reduction of air pollution. In my opinion, the government should take more measures and execute more effective plans to reduce pollution and create a pollution-free environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-21 | Nina Tsarevich | 70 | view |
- Some people say that a child can develop on its own others say that teachers and parents have crucial role Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- If some people get a chance to choose between life without work or spending most of the time working then they would choose not to work Do you agree or disagree 67
- If some people get a chance to choose between life without work or spending most of the time working then they would choose not to work Do you agree or disagree 61
- If some people get a chance to choose between life without work or spending most of the time working then they would choose not to work Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some feel that governments should prioritize healthcare instead of other important areas To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
...l fuels can be prohibited, reducing the no of industries and factories in cities, ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, for example, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 5.75862068966 330% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1328.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08812260536 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8612148474 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 139.433497537 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471264367816 0.580463131201 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 76.6236745399 50.4703680194 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.666666667 104.977214359 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.415286646743 0.242375264174 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.189095336061 0.0925447433944 204% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.147249964237 0.071462118173 206% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.294931196371 0.151781067708 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0987250760118 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.32886699507 93% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 55.0591133005 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 63.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.