Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?
Recently, the effect of laws on human behavior has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "do laws change human behavior?". Whereas it is a widely held view that laws do not change human behavior, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, human behavior is bound up inextricably with strict rules, which indicates it leads to both socail norms and cultural values. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2018 demonstrates the relationship between illegal activities and violent acts as well as an exponential increase in crime rate. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of existing legislation is correlated positively with not only standards of behavior but also community values.
Within the realm of criminal justice system, without the slightest doubt, antisocail behavior attribute to unlawful activities, in that it would come down to juvenile crime, street crime, and corporal punishment. A salient example of such attribution is a death sentence, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take human values for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint the abnormal behavior problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to court rulling, court judgment, and even jury's verdict. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of social laws in changing human behavior.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that laws change human behavior. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-11 | Sridarani | 74 | view |
| 2024-04-25 | Rafia Jawad | 55 | view |
| 2024-03-23 | Nina Tsarevich | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-26 | topraveesh | 77 | view |
| 2024-01-24 | topraveesh | 80 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view? 77
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 85
- The environment we are living in is in danger due to various problems…so who do you think should be responsible for solving it? Is it the governments, organization or each individual? 11
- Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Do u agree or disagree? Give examples from your experience 85
- The mass media including TV, radio, and newspaper can influence in young generation life. What is your opinion? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 472, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tunity to pinpoint the abnormal behavior problems. Likewise, hardly had they conf...
^^
Line 10, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1612.0 1207.87684729 133% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57785467128 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98796891517 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 139.433497537 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664359861592 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6239110145 50.4703680194 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2307692308 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.53846153846 7.25397266985 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.306006813014 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0985323706375 0.0925447433944 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996420629534 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182070109052 0.151781067708 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0949570909873 0.0609392437508 156% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 12.6369458128 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.63 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.