Some people only have pets to not feel lonely, for example, but they don’t always take proper care of them. Do you think people who don’t always take proper care of their pets should be allowed to keep them?
Nature made many living beings on the earth, but they did not get brain, while human is intelligent, likewise some people keep the pets, but they do not proper take care of them. So that they should not allow to keep the pets in their homes. I will discuss this topic in upcoming paragraphs.
To begin with, the people who keep pets in their homes, they do not feel lonely and pets also protect their home from some crimes like theft. Moreover, their offspring can play with pets, due to which they can spend their leisure time easily. Furthermore, sometime people throw outside their leftover food, while which can eat their pets.
Apart from this, some animals are very beneficial for people, they are also source of income, like buffaloes and cow which help them in earning, due to this they can live luxurious life, therefore any person or animal give profit to the people, we should always pay proper attention for them. But if people will not take care properly of animals, then they have to face some health problems due to which they can also die, whereas the right of death and born is in the hand of God, likewise people will go against the God.
In conclusion, It can be said that animals are very beneficial for people, so that if they person keep them in the homes, then their proper take care is necessary for people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[3]
Message: “So that” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...t they do not proper take care of them. So that they should not allow to keep the pets ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'keeping'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'allow' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: keeping
... of them. So that they should not allow to keep the pets in their homes. I will discuss...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pets. Apart from this, some animals are very beneficial for people, they are als...
^^
Line 3, column 78, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sourced'.
Suggestion: sourced
...ry beneficial for people, they are also source of income, like buffaloes and cow which...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 238, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... any person or animal give profit to the people, we should always pay proper atte...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, if, likewise, moreover, so, then, therefore, whereas, while, apart from, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1095.0 1207.87684729 91% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5625 5.00649968141 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.04701255899 2.71678728327 75% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545833333333 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.9 379.143842365 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.8660287677 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.8888888889 7.25397266985 191% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.376830437074 0.242375264174 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162745102795 0.0925447433944 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0934367357898 0.071462118173 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.246349724409 0.151781067708 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0524832214238 0.0609392437508 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 53.1260098522 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.5310837438 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.16 8.32886699507 86% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 55.0591133005 62% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.