Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you support it or not?
The importance of celebrities which was always contentious has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is highly beneficial while others reject this notion. The substantial influence of wastage of money has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further explain this argument for favoring above trend and thus will lead to be a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that role models are trend setters and easily effect on youngster’s mind. As a well-known example, remarkable research in this area inevitably reveals that with the help of role models the proportion of awareness has increased from 10 percent to 30 percent in youngsters. Furthermore, they learn to work hard and harsh problems from their life. Needless to say, all these merits are stand stars for role models for youngsters in a good stead.
Moreover, there are some more merits but one of the most crucial effect is that todays people are educated as compared to last decade therefore they can often gain their knowledge and skills from role models, as a result, it a vital role in their life. In addition, in this contemporary era, successful stars always share their feeling and experience with their fans and encourage youngsters for success in their life.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of celebrities are role models for youngsters are indeed too great to ignore. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of role models.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-17 | aminrad | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-31 | yasamin.gharib62 | 88 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | NancySood | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Dilpreet singh | 72 | view |
| 2019-06-07 | Majheal Singh | 77 | view |
- Dangerous activities like extreme skiing, bungee jumping, etc should be supported or not. 79
- Benefits of co-education 77
- Should teenagers be allowed to make decisions Agree or not 89
- Benefits of Co-education 77
- Do you think consumer should avoid over packaged product, or is it responsibility for producer. 55
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... why many are in favor of role models.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in addition, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 283.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11660777385 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10153676581 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75115060965 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 139.433497537 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56183745583 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6819937365 50.4703680194 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5833333333 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.33333333333 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178270631333 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0644154952732 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0719926616566 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108646954081 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.060581918171 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 12.6369458128 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.