Recently, the phenomenon of change in human behavior and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of laws is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that strict rules can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, human behavior can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that merits of laws, as well as the change in behavior due to laws, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered that a man can change his behavior according to the law of that country. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both laws and human behaviour apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, unenforced law might increase the consequences of crime. Moreover, fundamental aspects of criminals could relate to this reality that the demerits of such strict laws pertain to control the law and order within the society. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of unenforced law is correlated negatively with less crime. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the human behavior and the changes in it due to the laws.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of laws far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of strict laws prove the significance of low crime rate, but also pinpoint safe and secure regulatory implications.
- Huge traffic everywhere in national capital region 55
- Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it? 88
- Sending children to boarding schools has become more and more popular, where children live and study from home (either abroad or in their own countries) is some countries. What may be the reasons? Is it a positive development? 85
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon. 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 281.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19572953737 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01739908789 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.583629893238 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 465.3 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1186460813 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4166666667 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268129222818 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898970412182 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492699767674 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144382761551 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0562109401757 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.83 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.