Some people suggest that each family should only have one car and encourage alternative vehicle. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, there is an ongoing trend of owning more than one car in a family. While it is possible to claim that it is a matter of a personal choice and affordability, however, in my opinion social and moral responsibilities comes first and merits of a car free society outweighs the demerits. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view by analyzing this argument deeply before drawing a plausible conclusion.
First of all, it is a known fact that rising pollution is mainly because of private vehicles. People tend to buy more than one car in order to maintain an elite lifestyle without realizing the dangers of carbon emission. Moreover, many developing countries are encouraging their citizens to use bicycles and public transport to avoid the usage of cars even if its in their budget range. Therefore, authorities must start awareness and legislative programs to sustain the balance of quality environment.
Second of all, money spent on a second car can be spend in a productive way. Nowadays, cars are very expensive and if a family can easily maintain their daily life with a single car than they can save huge amount of money for the better education of their children because a child's future is directly proportional to the country's future. Hence, it is apparent that the single car is more than sufficient for a family.
To recapitulate, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that having a car is more than a blessing and we must motivate ourselves to use public transport and help other instead of wasting our hard earned money.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 210, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'responsibilities'' or 'responsibility's'?
Suggestion: responsibilities'; responsibility's
...however, in my opinion social and moral responsibilities comes first and merits of a car free so...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 57, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a productive way" with adverb for "productive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...oney spent on a second car can be spend in a productive way. Nowadays, cars are very expensive and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, however, if, moreover, second, so, therefore, while, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1298.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87969924812 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79010186875 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601503759398 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 422.1 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.2126762651 50.4703680194 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.0 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1818181818 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109103768143 0.242375264174 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0389392293478 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0295715060978 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0622356772842 0.151781067708 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0134053615688 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.