Some people think placing advertisements in schools is a great resource for public schools that need addition funding, but other think it exploits children by treating them as a captive audience for corporate sponsors. Choose which position you must agree with and discuss why you chose that position. Support your point of view with details from your own experiences, observation or reading?
Although such topics, in all likelihood, will never yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on placing advertisements in public schools to secure additional funding can lead to thought-provoking discussions. my opinion is that irrespective of the numerous arguments that exit on either side, using every single resource is mandatory to secure the funds for enhancing the educational process.
There are a number of reasons in favor of my stance. To begin with, many public schools suffer from the lack of funding from government, and it needs to arrange alternative sources such as placing advertisements to improve the educational system. It is important to note that when students engage with such activities, there is a policy which control their involvement. Therefore, the aforementioned discussion shows that the children are secured from any negative exploitation.
Another pivotal aspect of the argument is that public schools should cope with the cutting-edge technology in the education system, and this need a lot of money to secure it. First and foremost, if the public school do not use their resources within acceptable criteria, its rank will decrease dramatically. This exemplifies that controlled advertisement process is an acceptable move within monitored program.
In conclusion, I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments I have provided, and hence, my opinion is that we cannot deny the importance of advertisement as a key source of funding to the public school.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: My
... lead to thought-provoking discussions. my opinion is that irrespective of the num...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1305.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50632911392 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23897863075 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620253164557 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3602796166 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.5 104.977214359 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.173106210516 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616455129102 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386147713201 0.071462118173 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101433530512 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0176134202594 0.0609392437508 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 11.5310837438 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.