Some universities deduct students marks if work is given late. What is your opinion and recommend some alternative actions for this problem?
With the advancement of technology, there are myriad change seen in the field of education. Now, most the of universities started assignment based scoring on improvement of skill,s. Universities set a date of submit their tasks within time if pupils cannot submit their task on time then teachers deduct their marks. I strongly accord this universities should penalize the students if they cannot submit their tasks with in time.
To begin with, fixing a deadline for submission any task will bring more responsibility and punctuality among the students and they motivate them to complete every tasks in their life on time. Furthermore satisfaction of their respective faculty., universities should strict bring these rules because if universities do no strict then aspirants will careless and they cannot success in their life as a causal approach cannot bring success in life.
On the other hand, teachers must guide the students for timely completion for their respective jobs and asks regularly to before due date. Moreover, they should must guide the week students where they are lacking for completion tasks. Last but not the least, universities may extend the time of completion task if someone has a solid reason for no submission tasks with in time.
In conclusion, universities should legally penalize the students they cannot complete tasks in time. Moreover, universities strict behave these rules if aspirants complete their cannot fixed date.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 179, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...nt based scoring on improvement of skill,s. Universities set a date of submit thei...
^^
Line 1, column 336, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...s deduct their marks. I strongly accord this universities should penalize the studen...
^^^^
Line 2, column 193, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...lete every tasks in their life on time. Furthermore satisfaction of their respective facult...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1232.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 230.0 242.827586207 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35652173913 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89432290496 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77425376127 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 139.433497537 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.504347826087 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 376.2 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9244653091 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.0 104.977214359 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9090909091 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.101044105985 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0515555963531 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0259703252035 0.071462118173 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735689101816 0.151781067708 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0166794816346 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.32886699507 94% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 55.0591133005 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.