Some universities deduct students marks if work is given late. What is your opinion and recommend some alternative actions for this problem?
With the advancement of technology, there are myriad change seen in the field of education. Now, most of the universities started assignment based scoring on improvement of skills. Universities set a fixed date of submit their tasks within time, if pupils cannot submit their task on time, then teachers deduct their student,s marks. I strongly accord this, universities should penalize the students, if they cannot submit their tasks with in time.
To begin with, fixing a deadline for submission any task will bring more responsibility and punctuality among the students and they motivate them to complete every tasks in their life on time. Furthermore, if universities do not strictly bring these rules then aspirants will careless and they cannot success in their life as a causal approach cannot bring success in life.
On the other hand, teachers must guide the students for timely completion for their respective jobs and asks regularly to before due date. Moreover, they should guide the weak students where they are lacking for completion tasks. Last but not the least, universities may extend the time of completion of tasks if someone has a solid reason for no submission on time.
In conclusion, universities should legally penalize the students if they cannot complete tasks timely. Moreover, universities should strictly behave these rules if aspirants complete their cannot fixed date.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 325, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , s
...time, then teachers deduct their student,s marks. I strongly accord this, universi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 10.5418719212 19% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 6.10837438424 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 5.94088669951 17% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1184.0 1207.87684729 98% => OK
No of words: 222.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33333333333 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74303243321 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 139.433497537 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.527027027027 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 360.9 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8515150198 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.636363636 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102619978017 0.242375264174 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0495861623284 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0234731958967 0.071462118173 33% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0715688427413 0.151781067708 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216577513783 0.0609392437508 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 55.0591133005 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.