The space travel is excellent these day, but there are many environmental problems in our planet we should tackle the problems but not travel space and spend a lot of money. Discuss this opinion.
Nowadays with the development of the technology space travelling is becoming very much popular in the world. Especially developed countries are now spending so much money on projects regarding space exploring. But there is a continuous argument that, countries should address more severe problems like environmental issues rather than spending money on space travelling. This essay will elaborate both arguments and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, few decades ago space travelling was only limited to some developed countries including United States, Russia and Japan. But with the time now it has become a trend and also competition among countries which they believed space travelling is a factor of measuring the development. Hence, developed countries are now more interested in exploring the space and they spend lot money on these kinds of projects. On the other hand, few years ago Russian Space Agency and NASA started some projects regarding space tourism, which give the opportunity for rich people to spend few days in the orbit as a vacation. But at the end we have the problem of, is this compulsory? Are we dont have other issues that have to be addressed instead of spending money on space travelling?
In contrast, most of the people argue that there are some major issues in the world that have to be look in to. Environmental issues such as global warming, climate changes, green house gas emissions are some of that. Almost all the countries especially some islands including Maldives are now facing catastrophic climatic changes severely. Hence I also strongly believe that the money spend on space exploring projects should be allocated for above mentioned issues.
To conclude, based on above mentioned factors it is clear that, major issues including Environmental problems should be solved before think on space travelling.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 689, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
... problem of, is this compulsory? Are we dont have other issues that have to be addre...
^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...atastrophic climatic changes severely. Hence I also strongly believe that the money ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, look, regarding, so, thus, in contrast, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1582.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 301.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25581395349 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7229881192 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.541528239203 0.580463131201 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8876575368 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.466666667 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 7.25397266985 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324655714569 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112407106234 0.0925447433944 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0685665540712 0.071462118173 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.195535370802 0.151781067708 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869050861419 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.