Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are role models for youngsters. Do you agree with this statement?
Nowadays, most of the young people follow movie stars and sports celebrities blindly because of their fame. It is argued by many critics that youngsters must not follow famous personalities. In my opinion, following a path of a successful person can be a roadmap for the young generation. In this essay, we will discuss the reasons for people's apprehension and reasons to follow their idols.
First of all, movie stars usually perform all type of characters including a villain or a drug dealer role in the movies. This type of characters leaves a strong negativity on the young brain when they see their idol is robbing a bank or killing someone in the movie. For example, Sanjay Dutt, who is famous for his negative roles of a gangster is quite popular among teenager who adulates him and tries to emulate him in real life. Therefore, it is evident that this type of role models have a far-reaching negative impact on the society.
Second of all, many sports and movie stars are an inspiration for everyone. Their struggle and hard work to achieve their goals is a real motivation for the youngsters to follow and copy the same in the real life. For instance, 1992 cricket world cup winning captain Imran Khan is a real inspiration with a dynamic and charismatic personality who not only played cricket but constructed a cancer hospital also from his philanthropy work.
In conclusion, this essay discussed how following a famous movie star because of negative movie characters can influence adolescent's mind towards crime and how following an inspiration personality can motivate us. In my opinion, every glamorous field has both negative and positive aspects, it depends on us to pick the right choice for ourselves.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 290.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9724137931 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74573715652 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568965517241 0.580463131201 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.1567943267 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.923076923 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.76923076923 7.25397266985 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 2.75862068966 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199784592148 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726136384896 0.0925447433944 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044117922766 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116342947255 0.151781067708 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186254015212 0.0609392437508 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.