Technological access to online music should be free as paid what do you think?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals online music has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always been intrigued to analysis and explain whether it should be paid or not. I will elaborate this notion in the further paragraphs.
To begin with, there are myriad pros of getting access to free music. The first and foremost, it helps a lot of struggling artists and composers to learn from pre-recorded music. As a case in point, majority of legends and trainers upload their videos on social apps to bring up the new talent. Secondly, singers who are best in this field they motivate to others who want become like them and teach so many things.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorn so there are some cons of free online music. Particular composed music loses its popularity and market value. This is because, masses take free source as granted and show adequate respect to composers.
To conclude, I firmly believe that actually learners should pay little amount to watch videos because due to this, they will not disrespect and learn very carefully.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, second, secondly, so, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 1207.87684729 84% => OK
No of words: 208.0 242.827586207 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85576923077 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.92707691288 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47590085811 2.71678728327 91% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6875 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 318.6 379.143842365 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5602022245 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 84.1666666667 104.977214359 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.3333333333 20.9669160288 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.25397266985 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187109500285 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0612550159264 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.061660517697 0.071462118173 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.092630299661 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0384866837008 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 12.6369458128 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.1260098522 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.9458128079 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.61 11.5310837438 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.