A recent development is technological advancement has touched all sections of society, especially the invention of the internet as a medium of knowledge and news transfer and sharing. It has touched almost all sections the area including distribution of news via a newspaper. Many proponents are debating this phenomenon and the need of newspaper in the modern world. Many argue that innovation and products in the area of smart devices like cell phone, tablets, and laptop computers have replaced new papers, however, others are of the opposite view stating that they would like to read news old-school ways. To large extent, I believe that there is no need for newspapers in the modern world.
To begin with, in the fast and dynamic modern era everyone prefers to have access of the latest news on the instantaneous basis, majority members of the society are now received faster new on their smart devices in the form of various apps, these are faster and latest. Moreover, it is extremely convenient to read news on demand and per interest. For instance, since long time I have not read any news in newspapers, I received business and environmental news on my cell phone on regular basis and its totally free.
On the other hand, a section of the village and urban areas where internet is not feasible, still prefer to read the news in the form of daily morning new papers. Furthermore, research has proven that there are detrimental effects of staying connected to news and internet all the time as compares to the news in paper format.
In conclusion, from the above examples, it is evident that although news in the form of print media is still widely accepted, however, according to me this trend is going to change very soon.
- Value added by travel in Education. Is travel a necessary component of education or not ? Will student sitting at home have more knowledge? ORStudent travel to study is over rated, we have brilli 85
- What are the pros and cons of staying connected on social media for 24 hrs a day 82
- Communication has changed significantly in the last 10 years. Discuss pros and cons of this change. 88
- if acting one's belief is better than just talking about it? 77
- In the past 100 years, there are many inventions such as antibiotics, airplanes, and computers. What do you think is the most important invent for the past 100 years? Why? 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, moreover, so, still, as to, for instance, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 297.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86195286195 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65289526372 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 139.433497537 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 453.6 379.143842365 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 61.8286087463 50.4703680194 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.272727273 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0 20.9669160288 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11435356719 0.242375264174 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738889170266 0.0925447433944 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.155188601816 0.071462118173 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0585079107653 0.151781067708 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0829305777203 0.0609392437508 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 53.1260098522 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.9458128079 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.